Jump to content

bartvbl's Blog

  • entries
    6
  • comments
    41
  • views
    18,983

Internet Explorer 9: Epic Fail


bartvbl

1,241 views

 Share

Ok, so yesterday the new internet Explorer 9 beta was released. And for all that are wishing that internet explorer would be a decent browser one day; this one does a step in the right direction, but some stuff is just fail.

The good parts.

As it looks like, Microsoft has finally realised that going with the standards is much better than defining them themselves. It was one of the huge mistakes they made with earlier versions of IE. We shall see what the results will be.

Next they (finally!!) got rid of toolbars. As it looks like microsoft has realised that they eat up screen space, have as only task to be plainly annoying and slow down the startup process. So IE9 has no toolbars.

Next is the very much advertised "hardware acceleration". Very graphical websites should run a lot smoother now. However, I found a comparison on a tech blog, that showed that for regular websites firefox and the other browsers are still faster than IE9. too bad :P From my own experience, the browser _does_ start a lot faster now.

Other features include a new download manager (finally), tab dragging from one window to another (I guess we might have wanted this once in some extremely rare case), and the possibility of dragging a website to your windows 7 taskbar, so that it becomes an icon in the taskbar with jumplists and everything.

The bad parts.

When I first looked at the user interface of IE9, the first thing I thought was "EPIC FAIL". If you look at the screenshot I attached, you can see that the tab bar is on the same level as the address bar. If you are like me, and have about 8 tabs open at once on a regular day, I wouldn't call this exactly smart. In firefox has been reserved a whole line of space for tabs. There you can still see what page is within the tab when you have many tabs opened. With IE9, you need to put a whole lot more effort in figuring out where that tab was you opened a little while ago. The worst of this is that there is no way of changing this. I searched through every single option in the options menu of IE9, but not "use old layout" checkbox, or some other kind of way of getting the tabs to another place than besides the address bar.

With the launch of IE9 now also comes the end of support for XP. From the keynote followed that XP does not have the glass aero effect built-in, so XP users will have to stick with IE8. How sad.

Also, thus far IE9 only runs on windows. We'll see if they drop a version for mac too in the near future.

So in general, I am going to stick with firefox as my default browser. IE9 proves once again that IE sucks in general (sorry IE users out there, but you should just start to use a decent browser ;) ). Even though it has some nice stuff like a download manager, HTML5 and a much better performance, the time that these features were added to its rivals was at the time IE8 was in development. So what they call "cool new features" is what I see as "necessary maintainance".

Now they have also messed up the UI in such a way that it is far from being user-friendly in any way and mainly focussed on saving space, IE will stay with this new version on the last place in my "most preferred browser" list.

 Share

19 Comments


Recommended Comments

More importantly, it looks like an installer.

Also, I learned that any (early?) version of any IE is complete and utter suck.

"You want to go to google? *crash*"

Link to comment

*Uses IE*

*has no problems with it*

>.>

The people who have problems with it are the ones who go to the virus-infested websites. >.>

Link to comment

*Uses IE*

*has no problems with it*

>.>

The people who have problems with it are the ones who go to the virus-infested websites. >.>

I agree with you.

IE is a great browser if you know how to use it correctly.

Link to comment

If you can't learn to spell youself, you shouldn't be typing on anything that can do it for you.

Link to comment

If you can't learn to spell youself, you shouldn't be typing on anything that can do it for you.

Bull. It can help a lot. Also, learn to spell the word "yourself".

Link to comment

OH, like one missing letter ruins the whole message. -.-

It can help, but you shouldn't be relying on it.

Link to comment

Having toolbars removed is NOT a good thing.

unless you are like me and see them as a banana of a month old..

Link to comment

Have any of you already tried out the Firefox 4 Beta?

It looks really awesome, but it runs so slow on my PC that I can't even look at a PDF file while I have about 8 other tabs open. If that doesn't change, I will possibly stick with FF 3.6. Or I try IE9.

BTW: The spelling check is quite annoying if you write in different languages (for me it's English and German). Then you always have to set the right language first, because otherwise all words will be marked red. D:

Another thing: The FF4 Beta seems to have [Please Talk Properly]ed up my Acrobat reader, so I had to reinstall it! D:|

Link to comment

Oh my lolfail @ the tabbar. Even with widescreen this doesn't make any sense.

I think the browser should suit your needs. You shouldn't be adapting to limited features.

The big market share of IE is more a sign of human lazyness than how good it is.

Link to comment

The big market share of IE is more a sign of human lazyness than how good it is.

Your sense of common sense is awesome!

Indeed, Microsuck has been trying to define their own standards from IE4 if I remember correctly. They gave up on that in IE7 after realising that actually following the standards wasn't such a bad thing at all. My best bet is that the large market share is today mainly due to not updated computers in companies and schools and people that haven't realised there are better browsers on the market.

So ignorance and lazyness fits perfectly in my picture of IE, and this next version seems to suit that idea very well.

Fun fact:

I have discovered some "common use" computers on my university, who sitll run IE5 (believe it or not: that browser was launched in 1999)

Link to comment

People who:

>Have an IQ over 100

>Do not like computer viruses and do pretty much anything to stop them

>Like to check out the code on webstes

use Firefox.


The people who have problems with it are the ones who go to the virus-infested websites. >.>

How are you so sure? You never can expect how a virus maker will attempt to inject viruses into your computer, even if it means to use sites that are trustworthy as a means to send them in.

If you're smart, I think you should try to erect as many defensive walls as you can.

Link to comment

The people who have problems with it are the ones who go to the virus-infested websites. >.>

How are you so sure? You never can expect how a virus maker will attempt to inject viruses into your computer, even if it means to use sites that are trustworthy as a means to send them in.

If you're smart, I think you should try to erect as many defensive walls as you can.

Correction, if you're smart, you'll try to erect as many defensive walls against viruses as you can, no matter what kind of websites you visit.

For e.g. RRU was attacked by a chinese spider. It's quite possible for RRU to be attacked by any number of kinds of malware which could then attack visitors. So just because you don't visit "virus-infested websites" doesn't mean you will never have a virus-infested computer.

Link to comment

The people who have problems with it are the ones who go to the virus-infested websites. >.>
How are you so sure? You never can expect how a virus maker will attempt to inject viruses into your computer, even if it means to use sites that are trustworthy as a means to send them in.If you're smart, I think you should try to erect as many defensive walls as you can.
Correction, if you're smart, you'll try to erect as many defensive walls against viruses as you can, no matter what kind of websites you visit.For e.g. RRU was attacked by a chinese spider. It's quite possible for RRU to be attacked by any number of kinds of malware which could then attack visitors. So just because you don't visit "virus-infested websites" doesn't mean you will never have a virus-infested computer.

See why I want a counter hacking program, they're going after every thing. I hope they didn't get HIRISE Recon One, or we're in deep crap.

Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.