I sense a flame war coming on. But really. You should meet one of the Biology teachers at my school, Mr. Mench. A bit of a joke, as his name came from the German word Mensch, which means human. A Jew turning Atheist, he likes to argue evolution in the face of creationism. I remember he said one time that creationists argue that because a watermelon is 97% water, that clouds are 3% away from being watermelons (as clouds are all water.). So, yeah.

Ya, This probably will start a flame war...

And, yes, evolution is a bunch of junk.

Proof: How do you get all those thousands of protiegns created at the same time and the same place?

And how do thety all just happen to stick together at the same time and same place?

In the lab, the protein was created WITH OUR HELP, AND ONLY ONE. And even though they do some with more, They never succeed with creating life.

Therefore, I don't see how anyone can even say the words evolution theory.

Ya, even Darwin himself admitted that if we don't find the links in the fossile record, his theory is junk.

And, we didn't find the links, now did we?

You don't find a bird with a wing starting to grow, or a monkey with one eye and the other just the socket.

So, you are clearly able to tell where I stand on this matter.

And, please, no flaming.

I totally agree with addict and you, sciguy. I also have a paradox of my own: "According to scientists, the universe is approximately 13.7 billion years old. These same scientists have discovered galaxies 200 billion light years away. This is impossible, according to their standards. You see, it would take 200 billion years for the light from those galaxies to get to earth, but by the standard, they would only have 13.7 in which to do it. Therefore, the universe is not even close to the assumed date." I'm also a Christian, and a creationist. Read Genesis 1 in the Bible for the answer to my paradox...Also, please no flaming me either, but ABSOLUTELY ask questions. :)

...

Edited July 2, 2015 by Lair

Time to drop my two cents into the bucket that is a boiling pot of oil which will spilleth over onto the heating element and thus start a war of flame.

My side is of evolutionists. Bacteria evolves to become immune to certain chemicals. A simple flu virus can grow adaptations to become something more deadly, and at one point insects were VERY large and now they are VERY small to compensate for the lack of resources.

Scientists also believe that there may have been more then one big bang, like a bag of popcorn. And like a bag or popcorn it is BY CHANCE that the right things happen that create a single organism of life.

[/science][begin General Debunking]

The thing I really don't like about the creationist theory is that it comes from a book, namely the bible. The Bible has been translated and re-translated and censored then translated again to a point where the idea of it all becomes a unreliable source.

Besides that (assuming there is a vastly intelligent being, what most people call 'god') Which more incredibly awesome. Someone just building a tower of Lego, or someone programming each Lego brick to meet at a certain point, interact with each other, and organize themselves into the tower?

[/General Debunking]

There. *ducks behind flame shield*.

the concept of evolution and that everything occurred by accident, through chance, is not a new science-based theory at all. Anaximander, a greek philosopher who died over 500 years before Christ was born, put forward the theory that the universe exists through chance.

Too bad that I see this now. I am very disappointed in you guys.